Ben Smith reports: “Clinton is calling on Bush to boycott the Olympics opening ceremony.”
Month: April 2008
Paris Mayor Cancels Olympic Torch Ceremony
The Beijing Olympics are simply too offensive to the sensibilities of free people around the world. The torch cannot withstand the massive protests surrounding its presence in Paris.
The mayor of Paris cancelled a ceremony due to mark the torch relay after activists hung a Tibetan flag from the city hall.
According to the BBC the ceremony was canceled after the torch had been extinguished three separate times by relay officials to avoid protesters. ESPN had broadcast a report saying the torch had actually been extinguished five separate times.
What has happened the last three days in Europe is a testament to the power people have when they exercise their right to speak freely and to assemble freely. These rights are absent in Tibet. The huge protests and the failures to keep the torch lit, despite thousands of police and a large detail of Chinese security forces running alongside the torch at all times is a mark of shame and disgrace on China and the Beijing Olympics – which is the exact opposite result China thought they would secure by hosting the Games.
I hope San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom is watching the events in London and Paris. Now is the perfect time for him to cancel the torch run through San Francisco. It is tainted with blood and it does not belong on American soil.
Update:

The Olympic torch is inside that van in Paris. I can’t tell if it is lit or not. Note that the final line of protection for the flame inside the van is the team of blue uniformed Chinese security forces. Can you smell the spirit of peace and freedom emanating from the Olympic torch? Me neither.
Pas de Flame au Tibet
Paris–Two Tibet independence activists were detained this morning along the torch route after Melanie Raoul (25) and Phil Kirk (23) abseiled off of Pont Au Change, unfurling a banner reading “Pas de Flame au Tibet.” More than 60 pro-Tibet marchers spontaneously gathered round the team on surrounding bridges and streets, chanting free Tibet slogans. The banner hang was intended to draw attention to the killing of over a hundred Tibetans by Chinese forces as part of their ongoing crackdown on freedom protests inside Tibet. Thousands of Tibetans and supporters from across Europe lined the relay route with colorful placards and flags today in Paris, amidst a global outcry against the Chinese government’s ongoing and brutal crackdown inside Tibet. Yesterday in London, Tibetan protests overshadowed China’s controversial relay run. The climbers were taken off the bridge by over 20 police in 3 police boats
“Pas de Flame au Tibet” means “No flame in Tibet.” This daring banner hang happened before the remainder of the Paris Olympic torch relay and ceremony were canceled, though I don’t doubt it contributed to that decision. Way to rock hard Mel & Phil.

They Commission Polls
Apologies for posting twice on Joe Lieberman in the same day, but Markos Moulitsas commissioned another poll in CT on the 2006 Senate race and how Connecticut voters think about their choices today.
Research 2000 for Daily Kos. 3/31-4/2. Regular voters. MoE 4% (9/10-12/2007 results)
If you could vote again for U.S. Senate, would you vote for Ned Lamont, the Democrat, Alan Schlesinger, the Republican, or Joe Lieberman, an Independent?
All
Lamont (D) 51 (48)
Lieberman (I) 37 (40)
Schlesinger (R) 7 (9)
Democrats
Lamont (D) 74 (72)
Lieberman (I) 19 (25)
Schlesinger (R) 2 (3)
Republicans
Lamont (D) 4 (7)
Lieberman (I) 74 (69)
Schlesinger (R) 19 (24)
Independents
Lamont (D) 53 (49)
Lieberman (I) 36 (38)
Schlesinger (R) 6 (9)
Lieberman has shored up his support with Republicans, who clearly see him as one of their own. He has predictably lost ground among Democrats. But interestingly, he also lost the same amount of ground (six points) with independents.
Clearly, his whole “independent” schtick isn’t playing well with real independent voters. I’ll have more on this poll later today. The crosstabs are below the fold. Crosstabs for last year’s poll can be found here.
I think this yet again shows both how successful Joe Lieberman was in 2006 at lying to the people of Connecticut about who he was and what he stood for. Would anyone believe him if today Lieberman were to say, “No one wants to end the war in Iraq more than I do”? Voters shouldn’t have believed them in 2006, but as our dear President says, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…you can’t get fooled again.”
This poll also shows how fed up Connecticut voters are with Lieberman’s embrace of a far right wing world view. It’s not what he ran on and independent voters have not been rewarded for their faith in the man’s long-perceived moderate views. Add to that a rise in Ned Lamont’s popularity and it’s safe to say that people in Connecticut now recognize how much they screwed the pooch by reelecting Lieberman.
Good Dem vs. Bad Dem
Last week we saw Senate Majority “Leader” Harry Reid wrap both arms tightly around Joe Lieberman.
“I can tell you Sen. Reid had talked to me a few times and said he knows there will be talk if we get more than 51 Democrats next year,” Lieberman said. “As far as he is concerned, I will retain my seniority, etc., no matter how many Democrats there are next year.”
Reid’s spokesman, Jim Manley, confirmed Lieberman’s account.
This inexplicable and indefensible response from Reid prompted outrage among real Democrats around the country. Not surprisingly, though, this anger towards Lieberman was not limited to Democrats outside of Washington.
To wit, Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa was rightly pissed:
In a March 30 appearance on ABC’s “This Week” program, Lieberman suggested that the Democratic Party left him.
“The Democratic Party changed. The Democratic Party today was not the party it was in 2000. It’s not the (former President) Bill Clinton-Al Gore party, which was strong internationalists, strong on defense, pro-trade, pro-reform in our domestic government.”
“It’s been effectively taken over by a small group on the left of the party that is protectionist, isolationist and basically … very, very hyperpartisan,” Lieberman said. “So it pains me.”
“That’s ridiculous,” Sen. Tom Harkin, an Iowa Democrat, said in response to Lieberman’s remarks. “It’s self-serving.”
Indeed Senator Harkin. Glad to see that some long standing Senators can see Lieberman for what he is…and say so in public.
Olympic Flame FAIL
Later in the relay, police threw other protesters to the ground and carried some away. The torch was snuffed out and placed on a bus.
It was extinguished and put on a bus again less than an hour later as protesters booed and began chanting “Tibet!” although none appeared to rush the torch.
The relay resumed but protesters were planning more demonstrations along Monday’s route.
Let me get this straight. Olympic organizers were so afraid that protesters would disrupt and possibly extinguish the Olympic flame that they extinguished the torch and put it on a bus not once, but twice? I thought the whole point of the Olympic flame was that you were never allowed to put it out.
That Word Doesn’t Mean What You Think It Means
Beijing Olympic Committee spokesman:
”A few Tibetan separatists attempted to sabotage the torch relay in London, and we strongly denounce their disgusting behavior,” said Sun Weide, a spokesman for the Beijing Olympic organizing committee.
Quick question: which is more disgusting?

Tibetans protesting the Olympic torch in London.
Or:

Norbu, son of Phurwagoen, 15, student at Tibetan Middle School, from Shanglung Village – shot and killed by Chinese security forces on March 16th in Amdo.
Or any of these much more graphic pictures of these Tibetans murdered by Chinese paramilitaries for protesting for their independence on March 16th.
In my view, only one of the pictures above is representative of “disgusting behavior” and it most certainly is not the one that involves free people expressing their political views with peaceful protest.
The San Francisco Torch
The Olympic Torch relay route only makes one stop in North America: San Francisco. The torch will arrive on April 9th – this coming Wednesday. Though the torch is only stopping in one American city and though San Francisco is historically among the most liberal when it comes to politics and protest, Mayor Gavin Newsom has consistently been an obstacle to alternative views about what the Beijing Olympics mean and what feelings the presence of the torch on American soil may elicit. Newsom has discouraged protesting and the exact torch route was only released last week – making it near impossible for the coalition of groups organizing against the torch in SF to lock down plans and apply for necessary permits. San Francisco is a city that is used to protests and I’d guess that at a certain point, Newsom has to just get out of the way and let events move forward. There is a large Tibetan-American community in the Bay Area and many, many people support Tibetan independence and human rights in SF. I’d simply hope that unlike in London and India, the US does not welcome Chinese security guards to surround the torch on its brief stop on American soil.

London: The guys in blue are Chinese security agents.
A coalition of Tibetan support groups in the Bay Area have a central website for activities and protests connected to the San Francisco torch relay. It is SFTeamTibet.org. You can get a schedule of all planned protests taking place on April 8th and 9th here.
CREDO Action has also printed free protest signs for the torch relay. You can reserve a protest sign here.
You can also sign up to get text message updates about the events at the protests in San Francisco by texting “sftorch” (leave out the quotation marks) to 41411.
Sarkozy Sets Conditions for Attending Olympics
This is a strong statement from France’s Human Rights Minister on what is required for President Nicoals Sarkozy to attend the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony.
In an interview with Le Monde, Rama Yade set out a list of conditions needed for Sarkozy to attend the ceremony August 8, the paper said.
“Three conditions are essential for him to attend,” she was quoted as telling Le Monde.
She said the conditions were: “An end to violence against the population and the liberation of political prisoners; shed light on the events in Tibet; and the opening of a dialogue with the Dalai Lama.”
Journalism: You’re Doing It Wrong
Glenn Greenwald drops ten tons of irony after dissecting an inane biographical interview of Attorney General Michael Mukasey by the Associated Press in a post called “The Associated Press fails to reveal Mukasey’s favorite color”:
This is why the Founders bestowed constitutional primacy to a free press. Just think about what the Government might be able to get away with — the kind of creepy propaganda they would be able to disseminate — without our ornery watchdogs serving as a vigilant check on the behavior of high political officials.
Heh, indeedy.
I remember growing up reading a magazine called Sports Illustrated for Kids. Like the name describes it, it was a reduced version of Sports Illustrated that featured a lot of how-to articles for different sports and questionnaire style interviews of popular athletes. I was able to learn what Wayne Gretzky’s favorite food was or what Jerry Rice felt the first time he caught a touchdown pass. While these were quite enjoyable to a ten year old child, I wouldn’t really consider Sports Illustrated for Kids a pinnacle of journalistic rigor.
The Associated Press interview of Mukasey by Lara Jakes Jordan strikes me as an inappropriate replication of Sports Illustrated for Kids journalism with one of America’s most controversial and infamous government officials.