
As we approach the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests by Chinese students in seek of democracy and economic reform, the New York Times has an amazing article of the accounts of the four different photographers who captured images of the lone man, carrying home bags of groceries, challenging a column of massive military tanks. This scene is undoubtedly one of the most powerful images of people in pursuit of freedom of the last century. To look at it is to feel a well of emotions at the strength and clarity of this anonymous act of defiance in the face of tyranny and violent brutality. Sadly, the Chinese government still treats the Tiananmen Square protests as something threatening, to be hidden from the citizenry and banned from internet searches. I fear that the defiance in this act is, in many ways, only felt outside of China as it should and does not reverberate through history with the same force behind the curtain of censorship erected, maintained, and continually modernized by the Chinese government.
Swan on Dodd
Tom Swan of Connecticut Citizen Action Group (and former Ned Lamont campaign manager) is one of the people I most respect in Connecticut politics. He’s a dyed in the wool progressive with a history of getting results, from forcing Joe Lieberman out of the Democratic Party to fighting for marriage equality and universal healthcare. Swan and CCAG have also done a lot of work around credit card reform, which is the subject of his Connecticut Post op-ed from yesterday on Chris Dodd’s achievements in that area and beyond. Swan writes:
That it happened at all is a credit to the leadership of our senior senator, who took on the banks and beat them. It’s no secret that Chris Dodd has been attacked from all sides recently. And certainly, public sentiment during the economic crisis helped make this moment possible.
But it was Chris Dodd — who’s been on the right side of this fight for 20 years — who held the line, insisting on much tougher protections than those included in a similar bill that had already passed the House of Representatives. As chairman of the Banking Committee and a 30-year veteran of the Senate, he shepherded the legislation through the chamber, drawing upon his unique ability to reach across the aisle to get some very conservative Republicans to join him.
In a career filled with big, bipartisan victories — the Family and Medical Leave Act, election reform after the 2000 debacle in Florida — passing meaningful credit card reform during a time of economic crisis may well prove the senator’s most lasting.
But the real winner here isn’t any public official, industry or interest group. It’s the American consumer, including the people of Connecticut, who have a right not to be deceived, misled or ripped off — particularly during a recession when they can least afford it. [Emphasis added]
Swan’s whole op-ed is worth a read, as it shows the remarkable scope of Dodd’s credit card reform legislation, which will surely go down as yet another piece of landmark lawmaking that will have a lasting impact on our country.
Ivy League
This is just hilarious. In a Washington Post editorial defending Sonia Sotomayor’s distinguished record from attacks on her gender, intelligence, and race, there’s this gem of a quote.
Former Bush adviser Karl Rove implicitly questioned Judge Sotomayor’s intelligence, saying in an interview with PBS host Charlie Rose that “I know lots of stupid people who went to Ivy League schools.”
You don’t say, Karl?

Specific Recommendations
Hilzoy has a number of very good, specific policy recommendations stemming from the Ezra Klein/Duncan Black premise that this is a moment for the president and Congress to show that Scott Roeder and the “pro-life” terrorists will not win in their effort to defeat the right of choice through violence and terrorism. Hilzoy writes:
One way to stop terrorism is by enforcing our laws. We should absolutely do that. But another is to make it clear that terrorism doesn’t work. We should do that too. And the best way I can think of is to change our present situation, in which only a handful of doctors perform late-term abortions.
Bill O’Reilly on Dr. George Tiller
http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf
Obviously the assassination of Dr. George Tiller was the work of a lone terrorist.
Responding to Political Murder with Bold Politics
Ezra Klein, in addition to being one of the leading progressive healthcare journalists, has long been one of the leading male voices in the blogosphere in support of feminism. It’s no surprise that his response to the murder of Dr. George Tiller really drives home some of the lessons that I both think America should be taking from this and steps to ensure hateful, violent right wing activists like Scott Roeder do not win in the battle for protecting the right to choose. Ezra nails what I think is a critical point: the murder of Dr. George Tiller was a political killing. It was politics by another means, meant to produce a political and effectively legal result related to the ability of a woman to obtain an abortion in the United States. Ezra writes:
As The American Prospect‘s Ann Friedman writes, this has to be understood in context. It is the final, decisive act in “an ongoing campaign of intimidation and harassment against someone who was providing completely legal health-care services.” That campaign stretched over decades of protests, lawsuits, violence, and, finally, murder. The different elements were not always orchestrated. But the intent remained constant: To counter the absence of a statute that would make Tiller’s work illegal with enough intimidation to render it impossible.
This was, in other words, a political act. Tiller was murdered so that those in his line of work would be intimidated. In conversations with folks yesterday, I heard well-meaning variants on the idea that it would be unseemly to push legislation in the emotional aftermath of Tiller’s execution. I disagree. Roeder was acting in direct competition with the United States Congress. And it’s quite likely that he changed the status quo. Legislative language and judicial rulings had made abortive procedures legal and thus accessible. Yesterday’s killing was meant to render abortive procedures unsafe for doctors to conduct and thus inaccessible.
Ezra suggests Congress and Duncan Black suggests that President Obama should view this as an opportunity for to step forward and defend the rights already exist, to ensure their continued existence. From increased protection for abortion providers to increasing access to comprehensive reproductive treatment in hospitals to incentivizing the training of doctors who can provide late term abortions (and thus directly ensuing Dr. George Tiller’s murder will not effect the availability of late term abortions in the long term).
Dr. George Tiller was murdered because there are people in this country who have been told for years that “abortion is murder.” It’s no shock that in the self-proclaimed “pro-life” movement’s efforts to stop abortion from being legally available to women while describing it as “murder,” their members might resort to violence to prevent abortion from taking place. Tiller was previously the target of politically motivated violence – he was shot twice and his clinic was bombed and as a result, wore a bulletproof vest daily. The AP has put together a timeline of over a dozen instances of rightwing violence targeting abortion doctors over the last two decades. The pattern is clear: violence has accompanied legislative, judicial, and ballot initiatives by the “pro-life” movement to limit American women’s access to abortions.
It’s time for a bold, moral defense of the right to choose through legislative action. Anything less constitutes caving in the face of the violence of terrorists.
Open and Transparent FAIL
I can’t really muster up much this morning beyond a semi-snarky headline. Just read Glenn Greenwald, close your eyes, and think real hard about living in a country where the rule of law prevails.
Travel Day
So no posting…other than to concede the obvious, that Bill O’Reilly is a psychic and we on the Left really do see white men like me as a problem. I can’t wait to see what Olbermann has to say about this one…
Razing Kashgar
Sadly, it looks like China is going to take a major step in destroying Uighur culture and the world (and specifically the global media) will not say a word in protest. The cultural genocide of the Uighurs is a clear path to ending the Uighur desire for freedom from Chinese occupation for East Turkestan. Obviously this is similar to the Chinese government’s policies aimed towards destroying Tibet’s culture and language as a means of solidifying their illegal military occupation and stifling Tibetan’s desire for freedom.
Stupid Attacks
Suzy Khimm is listed by The New Republic as a “reporter-researcher.” I haven’t yet waded through her three page article on Chris Dodd and his coming perilous reelection campaign to judge her overall ability as a reporter, but by the second paragraph it’s pretty easy to see that she’s not a researcher. Khimm writes:
Today, Dodd–five-term senator, established Washington powerbroker, the man whose “magnificent handshake,” The New York Times gushed two years ago, is “the grip of a pro, a … political pro, which he is”–has been reduced to shoring up his liberal bona fides by railing against credit card companies on a blog called My Left Nutmeg (motto: “Where Connecticut Dems Scratch That Progressive Itch”).
Senator Dodd’s first diary on My Left Nutmeg was on March 7, 2007, over two years ago. I know because at the time I was a front-page contributor and administrator of the site. I bumped his post from the diary section to the front page.
About two months later I joined Dodd’s presidential campaign’s internet department. Our campaign frequently posted updates from the campaign trail in diaries on MLN, so Nutmeggers could continue to see the hard work Dodd was doing both for our country and for Connecticut as a legislator, using his heightened profile as a presidential candidate to get more done for us all in the Senate. Additionally, during his frequent live chats with blog readers on the campaign trail, Dodd engaged with readers on My Left Nutmeg. Dodd wasn’t alone in the CT delegation in engaging this community from the campaign trail – Congressmen John Larson, Chris Murphy, and Joe Courtney all recorded strong endorsements of Dodd that we posted on MLN.
All of this is to say that Dodd has not been “reduced” to anything this cycle. He is doing what he’s always done – engage constituents in meaningful ways. He’s long viewed MLN as a key part of the Connecticut progressive-Democratic infrastructure and that he’s continuing to engage it not is not only not a shocking, bad thing, but a positive note that augurs well for his reelection prospects. It’s unfortunate that the TNR’s “reporter-researcher” didn’t bother to fact check one of her first sentences, as even the most cursory research would have proven her premise wrong.