More From “Time” on Tibet

Simon Elegant has a more detailed piece on his recent travel to Tibet in Time. The piece begins with a testimony on Chinese surveillance and Tibetan defiance:

When asked how his New Year celebrations have been, the pilgrim — a middle-aged businessman wearing a heavy winter coat against the bitter winds that knife through the monastery’s narrow alleys — immediately glances up and then over his shoulder. It is the universal, instinctive reaction of Tibetans I talked to on a recent trip to China’s far western province of Qinghai, where ethnic Tibetans make up the majority of the population in the areas closest to the Qinghai-Tibet border. “Cameras,” he hisses, nodding upward. “The police have them everywhere.”

Pulling me into the shadow of one of the deep doorways cut into the monastery’s thick walls, he launches into a tirade that reflects the feelings of most of the Tibetans I spoke to in the region, a group ranging from nomadic herdsmen to shopkeepers to students to monks. “We didn’t celebrate anything this year, because we have nothing to celebrate,” he says grimly. “We want to respect and commemorate the people who were killed last year,” when demonstrations against Chinese rule in Lhasa, capital of the Tibet Autonomous Region, which neighbors Qinghai, turned violent. Beijing says 19 were killed, mostly innocent Chinese shopkeepers. Tibet’s government in exile, led by its spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, put the number at more than 200, mostly Tibetans. This businessman, like many of his compatriots, passionately insists that the real number is in the thousands. “We are a people living under the gun. They tried to make us celebrate the New Year, but we refused. They jail us if we display pictures of the Dalai Lama. They even force our children to study only in Chinese at school,” he tells me. “But we will never forget we are Tibetans and will always have the Dalai Lama in our hearts.”

Additionally Elegant interviews a Tibetan nomad who speaks to the extent that the Chinese government is cracking down on the boycott of Losar (Tibetan New Year) by Tibetans.

Not surprisingly, the boycott has apparently angered Chinese authorities, who sources in exile allege have been engaged in a security crackdown code named Strike Hard since Jan. 18 in an attempt to head off trouble. “They have conducted house-to-house searches. They have military in plain clothes everywhere and snipers on the roofs,” says Tsewang Rigzin, president of the Tibetan Youth Council based in Dharamsala, India. According to one nomadic herdsman I meet at the Longwu monastery in Tongren, one of the most important outside the Tibet Autonomous Region, the attempt by the authorities to force celebrations — and the Tibetan resistance that has followed — has extended even into some remote areas. The 53-year-old, dressed in a traditional fleece-lined long coat and fingering his prayer beads, recounts how security forces came in January to his village in neighboring Gansu province and tried to enforce celebrations through a system of collective responsibility. “Ten days before New Year, the police came and divided us into groups of 20 families and put one or two people in charge. They were given a few thousand yuan and told they were responsible, that they would be punished if there were no celebrations,” he explains. “Later they came and arrested nine people who they said were ringleaders in the refusal campaign, even though they had nothing to do with it.”

This testimony goes along the New York Times report of the Chinese government trying to pay Tibetans to celebrate Losar and cracking down on those who have refused.

NYT on China’s Crackdown in Tibet

The increased media focus on what China is doing inside of Tibet and how Tibetans are responding to the crackdown continues to in the New York Times:

The increased forces have been seen in at least four crucial areas of the vast Tibetan region: Lhasa, the capital; Xiahe, a town in Gansu Province that is home to a large and restive monastery; Tongren, a monastery town in Qinghai Province; and Lithang, a town in Sichuan Province that has been locked down this week. …
On Tuesday, the government ordered shops and hotels to shut down for three days, several residents said by telephone. A young woman, who asked not to be named for her safety, said, “Shops have all closed, and people do not dare to go out.”

Local security officers declined to comment when asked about the episode over the telephone.

The campaign for the boycott of Losar, the Tibetan New Year, has spread via text and e-mail messages and fliers. The holiday begins next Wednesday.

Last March, Tibetans angry over China’s policies in Tibet and the suppression of peaceful protests rioted in Lhasa, leading to widespread damage and the deaths of at least 18 civilians and one police officer, according to the official Xinhua news agency. Protests flared up in other regions, and exile groups said hundreds of Tibetans were killed in the ensuing crackdown.

The call for a boycott began several months ago and has gained traction among younger Tibetans as well as intellectuals and dissidents. It has been endorsed by overseas Tibetans, including the government in exile in Dharamsala, India.

“It’s deeply connected with Tibetan culture, the idea that after such a horrible year filled with death, how can we celebrate?” Woeser, a popular Tibetan blogger, said in an interview. “Instead, it should be a memorial.”

The Times goes on to report on how last spring’s national uprising is continuing to reverberate in Tibet. Recent reports from inside Tibet say that contrary to reports from China and the Tibetan Government in Exile, thousands of Tibetans were murdered by Chinese forces during the exile. Additionally thousands more languish in jail and other thousands have simply disappeared.  Those who have been released from prison are barred from returning to monasteries (if they were monks) and their is intense surveillance on Tibetans by the Chinese government.

A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said last week that “the situation in Tibet is stable.” But a monk from Lhasa, reached by phone, said, “There are a lot of soldiers and People’s Armed Police in the streets,” referring to China’s main paramilitary force. Like almost all the people interviewed for this article, the monk agreed to speak only on the condition of anonymity for fear of government reprisals.

The monk said he, like thousands of other monks, had not been allowed to return to his monastery after being imprisoned for several months last year after the March uprising. Many of the main monasteries are being emptied out, he said. There are only about 400 monks now in the Drepung Monastery in Lhasa, he said, a small fraction of the number before the uprising.

The monks are still being forced to take “patriotic education” classes that have been going on in many monasteries since the March protests, he added. As a result, the monks study Chinese law rather than Buddhist scriptures and are told to denounce the Dalai Lama.

Monks no longer in the monasteries are barred from wearing their robes in public, the monk said, and the police check on the monks at home, at times hauling some off to prison. The monk said Tibetan policemen came to his home three times a month.

“They ask, ‘Where have you been?’ ” he said. “ ‘Have you been out? What are Tibetans talking about in the society? Have you met with friends who are in prison?’ ”

The monk said many Tibetans in Lhasa were talking of joining the boycott. But he said that Chinese officials were urging the Tibetans to carry on with festivities and were even offering them money to do so.

This is a truly chilling report. China is cracking down not only on Tibetans who have spoken out for independence, but the entire populace. Towns and cities are turned to prisons, as the ramped up Chinese military presence has created a climate of fear. Chinese forces are trying to buy cooperation from Tibetans, yet the desire for freedom remains unabated in Tibet.
Generally speaking I don’t like to simply quote long passages from news stories. Or at least, it’s not my preferred style of blogging. But it’s incredibly important that the few pieces of journalism about what is going on inside Tibet are shared and amplified so more people see the truth about China’s ongoing military occupation of Tibet and the continue Tibetan spirit of defiance in the face of Chinese brutality.

Huge Protests in Lithang

Free Tibet Campaign is reporting that hundreds of Tibetans in Lithang (eastern Tibet) have taken part in protests:

Tibetan monks, laypeople and nomads have staged the largest protest (1) to have taken place in Tibet since last Spring, according to reports received by Free Tibet. The protests, which involved hundreds of Tibetans. took place in Lithang county in eastern Tibet yesterday and on Sunday and were prompted by the arrest of a Tibetan who had publicly called for Tibetans not to celebrate the traditional new year holiday of Losar. At least 24 Tibetans have been reported to have been detained as a result of the protests.

The Washington Post is also covering the protests and is now reporting that all of Lithang is on lockdown by Chinese security forces. Lithang, while part of Tibet, is in Sichuan province. That is, it’s part of Tibet that China has defined outside of their definition of Tibet. That said, it’s nearly all Tibetan and as the lockdown and protests show, is an area that is distinctly not part of China.

Tim Johnson of McClatchy News also has a piece today that looks at how Tibetans inside Tibet are currently thinking about last year’s national uprising and the Chinese response.

Scratch only a little bit, and Dorje, a Tibetan nomad, lets loose with a tirade at the people he simply calls “the Chinese,” the majority Han who he says will get no respite from Tibetan frustration this year – or for generations.

“After I die,” the 53-year-old grizzled herder says, “my sons and grandsons will remember. They will hate the government.”

On the cusp of the first anniversary of a mass revolt on the Tibetan Plateau that marked the worst ethnic unrest in China in nearly two decades, many Tibetans still seethe at living under China’s thumb. Some engage in small-scale civil disobedience. Others, including monks, brazenly display photographs of the Dalai Lama, the exiled leader they revere as a God-king but that China maligns as a “beast.” Nearly all gripe about a lack of religious and political freedom.

Clearly the protests in Lithang are an instantiation of the anger that Tibetans still hold for China’s ongoing military occupation of Tibet. It’s good that major Western news outlets like the Washington Post and McClatchy are paying attention to what is happening in Tibet and how Tibetans continue to struggle for freedom.

The Final Inch

My good friend Tom Grant is the producer for the Oscar-nominated documentary short, “The Final Inch.” He was also detained during the Beijing Olympics and sentenced to ten days in jail for filming protests by Tibet activists during the Games. He’s interviewed by TrustMovies about the film and his actions around the Olympics. I’ll be pulling for “The Final Inch” this Sunday.

If you’re in DC, all the Oscar-nominated short documentaries will be shown at the National Archives this Sunday at noon. Click here for more information on the screenings.

Obama & the Rule of Law

I don’t know if there are any civil libertarians or scholars whose views on the rule of law I trust more than Glenn Greenwald’s. Glenn has been one of the most vocal advocates for defending the Constitution throughout the Bush administration and was a key player in bringing pressure to bear on Democrats during the FISA reauthorization fights of 2007 and 2008. That’s why I tend to take his views on how President Obama is handling rule of law questions, such as those raised by Charlie Savage in today’s New York Times, quite seriously.

I agree with Greenwald that Obama has made steps in the right direction, but has generally taken a longer view to resolving problematic powers left to him by the Bush administration. In the first few weeks of his presidency, Obama has issued some positive executive orders pertaining to the rule of law. At the same time, some of his underlings have taken positions on a number of issues that signal they want to continue Bush-era powers unabated. Glenn rightly points out that “Policies become policies when the President adopts them, not when some of his appointees advocate them.”

I would feel a whole lot better had Obama promised on the campaign trail, as Chris Dodd did,  that on the very first hour of his very first day in office, he would sign executive orders to restore the Constitution and the rule of law to America. Obama didn’t make this promise and he hasn’t acted to realize the same ends yet. I hope that he does. But as with Greenwald, we cannot rely on the fact that Obama is a Democrat and someone Democrats supported and thus infinitely better suited to hold the powers of the presidency as George W. Bush as cause to stop pressuring President Obama to restore the rule of law in America. As Glenn writes:

We don’t place faith in the Goodness and kindness of specific leaders — even Barack Obama — to secretly exercise powers for our own Good.  We rely instead on transparency and on constant compulsory limits on those powers as imposed by the Constitution, by other branches, and by law.  That’s what it means to be a nation of laws and not men.  When Obama embraces the same abusive and excessive powers that Bush embraced, it isn’t better because it’s Obama rather than Bush wielding that power.  It’s the same.  And that’s true even if one “trusts” Obama more than Bush.

A genuine reversal of the last eight years — meaning something more than just sand-papering the roughest edges — will come not from having a kinder-hearted and more magnanimous leader, but only from a restoration of the legal and Constitutional framework that makes a President’s magnanimity irrelevant, since his powers are exercised transparently and with real checks and limits.  It remains very much an open question whether that will happen.  There are some preliminary signs that it could, and some much more concrete signs that it won’t — at least not without a very concerted fight.

There really haven’t been any situations were President Obama (or president-elect Obama) asked the civil liberties base to “make him do it,” a la Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  But that doesn’t mean that progressives and people who believe in the importance of the rule of law to the American project should not push to make restoring the Constitution a top priority for Obama. Bush era policies on rendition, torture, wiretapping, state secrets, executive privilege, and habeas corpus must not live on in an Obama presidency. While we can hope that Obama will not misuse these powers as long as he possesses them, we cannot leave it to hope that he will simply do the right thing while keeping the powers for the presidency.

Standing up for the rule of law during an Obama administration is not a stand against Obama. Pointing out the need to recommit our nation to the rule of law is not an attack. And while I personally wish there had been more done on this front already – and that Obama’s appointees were expressing at minimum the same levels of commitment he made as a candidate on this array of issues – I do think, like Greenwald, that the door is still wide open for President Obama to restore the rule of law. I would just propose that Obama can go faster.

Losar Civil Disobedience in Tibet

Tibetans inside Tibet have been working on a campaign for civil disobedience when it comes to Losar (Tibetan New Year) this year. Instead of celebrating in normal fashion, countless Tibetans will be in mourning for the thousands killed by the Chinese military in the national uprising last spring and the untold thousands more who are languishing in prison or have been disappeared.

China has closed Tibet to foreign visitors and the media – not just the T.A.R. but eastern Tibetan regions that are incorporated into Chinese provinces. Time’s China Blog reports on the closures and the Losar boycott:

Whatever the truth, it’s what the ordinary Tibetans believe–and the rage it inspires– that counts. The boycott infuriated the Chinese authorities, but more on that later when we’ll have a story about what seems to have been a wide scale act of civil disobedience. That could be repetaed [sic] in the Tibet Autonomous Region proper from February 25th onwards when the official Tibetan new year begins. (Tibetans outside the TAR don’t much choice but to celebrate according to the Chinese lunar calendar).

Update: the government has now announced that all Tibetan areas in Qinghai, Sichuan and Gansu provinces are closed to foreigners, so it looks as though we got in just in time

China is locking down Tibet at a time when there are widely circulating plans for civil disobedience. The Chinese government is setting up the conditions for a massive crackdown with no international witnesses or media to report on their actions. That the action of cutting off 30% of the land controlled by the Chinese government from all foreign tourists and press isn’t drawing international outrage and attention is a bad statement about the willingness of the global community to criticize the Chinese government for their reprehensible behavior.

Dodd Caps Executive Compensation to TARP Companies

I’m very happy to see that my former boss, Senator Chris Dodd, has gone out and done the right thing over administration objections. The New York Times reports:

A provision buried deep inside the $787 billion economic stimulus bill would impose restrictions on executive bonuses at financial institutions that are much tougher than those proposed 10 days ago by the Treasury Department.

The provision, inserted by Senate Democrats over the objections of the Obama administration, is aimed at companies that have received financial bailout funds. It would prohibit cash bonuses and almost all other incentive compensation for the five most senior officers and the 20 highest-paid executives at large companies that receive money under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

The stimulus package was approved by the House on Friday, then by the Senate in the late evening.

The pay restrictions resemble those that the Treasury Department announced this month, but are likely to ensnare more executives at many more companies and also to cut more deeply into the bonuses that often account for the bulk of annual pay.

The restriction with the most bite would bar top executives from receiving bonuses exceeding one-third of their annual pay. Any bonus would have to be in the form of long-term incentives, like restricted stock, which could not be cashed out until the TARP money was repaid in full.

The provision, written by Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, highlighted the growing wrath among lawmakers and voters over the lavish compensation that top Wall Street firms and big banks awarded to senior executives at the same time that many of the companies, teetering on the brink of insolvency, received taxpayer-paid bailouts.

“The decisions of certain Wall Street executives to enrich themselves at the expense of taxpayers have seriously undermined public confidence,” Mr. Dodd said Friday. “These tough new rules will help ensure that taxpayer dollars no longer effectively subsidize lavish Wall Street bonuses.”

Top economic advisers to President Obama adamantly opposed the pay restrictions, according to Congressional officials, warning lawmakers behind closed doors that they went too far and would cause a brain drain in the financial industry during an acute crisis. Another worry is the tougher restrictions may encourage executives to more quickly pay back the government’s investments since, in a compromise with the financial industry, banks no longer have to replace federal funds with private capital. That could remove an extra capital cushion, further reducing lending.

The key with Dodd’s provision is that it sets the caps retroactively and not just moving forward. A lot of corporations who took billions from the taxpayer coffers and spent substantially on their executives, and not on getting the economy moving forward, are going to have to give the money back. This is meaningful accountability and it shows that the US government will not tolerate rewarding people who ran their companies into the ground and then came begging for cash from Uncle Sam.

This is an important part of the stimulus legislation. It would be deeply disappointing if the administration tried to cut it out or nullify it in any way.

Ya Think?

Markos:

I’ve got an idea about what Obama should do with that post. It’s kind of crazy, but keep an open mind and try not to dismiss it out of hand, no matter how unconventional it might be in today’s political world:

Nominate a fucking Democrat.

That’s so crazy it just might work.